cannaa 发表于 2013-5-12 08:58:19

美国联邦地区法院判决李永败诉

2007-12-22 22:47:41 发表于多维

美国联邦地区法院
麻省地区
民事诉讼编号:05-12035-RGS

李永

雷神公司,IAN C.MICHELL,和
ARTHUR BULIUNG

判决采纳被告的动议做直接判决

2006年十一月三十日

Stearns,地区法官

此案发于原告李永和被告雷神公司之间的劳务纠纷,以及公司如何调查回应李在公司内部提出的种族歧视指控。 被告雷神公司,Ian C. Mitchell (李在雷神的部门经理),和Arthur Buliung (前雷神人事部负责人) 要求对李提出的所有歧视和报复指控以及所有相关的州法指控做直接判决[即没有陪审团,由法官做判决]。被告指出在实质性的事实上[双方]没有分歧,也没有证据可以证实李的指控。

法庭同意雷神[的论点],李的指控不成立,因为无论如何,李是一个自由雇员,没有有力证据证实雷神对待李和别人不一样,李也没有提供有力证据[证实]报复行为,这种行为包括她受到不公就业对待,或是雷神疏忽处理她的内部歧视指控,或是雷神在她病休期限过后不能上班做出不妥安排。基于被告雷神公司,Ian C. Mitchell 和 Arthur Buliung 在其备忘录中例出的种种理由,针对[李的]两个联邦法指控,被告的提议要求直接判决获得许可。

因此判决

/s/ —
RICHARD G. STEARNS
[联邦]地区法官


1。本庭完全熟悉案中事实和指控,曾经处理了65个动议,并准许李在2006年二月修改她的上告文。

2。基于联邦法指控已被撤消,本庭拒绝受理李的州法指控。参见案例 Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 350 n.7 (1988)

英文判决请看:
http://www.speakout.com/forum_view.asp?Forum=Court&MID=125481&mMID=125481

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-12035-RGS

YONG LI
v.
RAYTHEON COMPANY, IAN C. MITCHELL,
and ARTHUR BULIUNG

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

November 30, 2006

STEARNS, D.J.                                                            

This action arises out of plaintiff Yong Li’s employment with defendant Raytheon Company and its investigations of Li’s internal race discrimination complaint. Defendants Raytheon, Ian C. Mitchell (Li’s former department manager at Raytheon), and Arthur Buliung (a former Raytheon human resources administrator) move for summary judgment on all of Li’s race discrimination and retaliation claims, and her associated state law claims. Defendants point out that the material facts are undisputed and that there is no evidence supporting Li’s claims.

The court agrees with Raytheon that Li’s claims fail because, among other things, she is an at-will employee, there is no competent evidence that Raytheon treated Li differently than any other employee, Li presents no competent evidence of retaliatory acts, that she suffered an adverse employment action, that Raytheon engaged in misconduct in its handling of her internal discrimination complaint or the investigation of her failure to return to Raytheon after the expiration of her Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in their supporting memorandum, the motion of defendants Raytheon Company, Ian C. Mitchell, and Arthur Buliung for summary judgment is ALLOWED on Li’s federal claims.

SO ORDERED.

RICHARD G. STEARNS
UNITED STATES DISTRIC JUDGE
——

1. The court is thoroughly familiar with the facts and claims in this case having acted on sixty-five motions of substance and procedure since allowing Li to amend her Complaint in February of 2006.

2. The foundational federal claims being dismissed, the court declines to consider Li’s various state-law claims. See Carnegie-Mellon Univ. v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 350 n.7 (1988)
页: [1]
查看完整版本: 美国联邦地区法院判决李永败诉